|
Place open
|
|
|
Place in category
|
/ 93 |
|
Place by sex
|
/ 287 |
|
Number
|
365 |
|
Result
|
DNS |
|
Loss to winner
|
|
|
Result better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
|
Place open
|
303 / 343
|
|
Place in category
|
94 / 106 |
|
Place by sex
|
279 / 312 |
|
Number
|
365 |
|
Result
|
01:46:40 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:41:51 |
|
Result better than
|
40 (11.7%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
12 (11.3%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
33 (10.6%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-17km |
01:08:36
(305)
|
01:08:36
(305)
|
| 17-27km |
00:38:04
(300)
|
01:46:40
(301)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
315 / 364
|
|
Place in category
|
108 / 123 |
|
Place by sex
|
293 / 333 |
|
Number
|
365 |
|
Result
|
01:51:26 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:44:28 |
|
Result better than
|
49 (13.5%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
15 (12.2%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
40 (12%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-14km |
01:03:29
(321)
|
01:03:29
(321)
|
| 14-26km |
00:47:57
(306)
|
01:51:26
(313)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
|
|
Place in category
|
/ 87 |
|
Place by sex
|
/ 293 |
|
Number
|
116 |
|
Result
|
DNS |
|
Loss to winner
|
|
|
Result better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
|
Place open
|
|
|
Place in category
|
/ 84 |
|
Place by sex
|
/ 273 |
|
Number
|
116 |
|
Result
|
DNS |
|
Loss to winner
|
|
|
Result better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
|
Place open
|
|
|
Place in category
|
/ 97 |
|
Place by sex
|
/ 293 |
|
Number
|
116 |
|
Result
|
DNS |
|
Loss to winner
|
|
|
Result better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
0 (0%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
|
Place open
|
213 / 248
|
|
Place in category
|
75 / 80 |
|
Place by sex
|
198 / 226 |
|
Number
|
14 |
|
Result
|
01:49:16 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:40:56 |
|
Result better than
|
35 (14.1%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
5 (6.3%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
28 (12.4%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-10km |
00:43:43
(214)
|
00:43:43
(214)
|
| 10-25km |
01:05:32
(210)
|
01:49:15
(213)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
176 / 230
|
|
Place in category
|
62 / 74 |
|
Place by sex
|
164 / 211 |
|
Number
|
14 |
|
Result
|
01:42:13 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:35:40 |
|
Result better than
|
54 (23.5%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
12 (16.2%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
47 (22.3%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-17km |
01:03:23
(174)
|
01:03:23
(174)
|
| 17-27km |
00:38:50
(180)
|
01:42:13
(176)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
179 / 247
|
|
Place in category
|
59 / 78 |
|
Place by sex
|
169 / 226 |
|
Number
|
14 |
|
Result
|
01:48:53 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:40:29 |
|
Result better than
|
68 (27.5%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
19 (24.4%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
57 (25.2%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-11km |
00:49:48
(183)
|
00:49:48
(183)
|
| 11-26km |
00:59:06
(182)
|
01:48:54
(179)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
223 / 341
|
|
Place in category
|
58 / 85 |
|
Place by sex
|
203 / 296 |
|
Number
|
99 |
|
Result
|
01:58:52 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:46:54 |
|
Result better than
|
118 (34.6%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
27 (31.8%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
93 (31.4%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-19km |
01:27:19
(224)
|
01:27:19
(224)
|
| 19-27km |
00:31:33
(217)
|
01:58:52
(223)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
312 / 347
|
|
Place in category
|
88 / 94 |
|
Place by sex
|
276 / 300 |
|
Number
|
99 |
|
Result
|
01:25:05 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:32:38 |
|
Result better than
|
35 (10.1%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
6 (6.4%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
24 (8%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-14km |
00:45:57
(251)
|
00:45:57
(251)
|
| 14-26km |
00:39:08
(328)
|
01:25:05
(312)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
251 / 324
|
|
Place in category
|
66 / 78 |
|
Place by sex
|
227 / 279 |
|
Number
|
99 |
|
Result
|
01:33:32 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:34:09 |
|
Result better than
|
73 (22.5%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
12 (15.4%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
52 (18.6%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
Split times
|
| Name |
Independently |
In total |
| 0-11km |
00:37:05
(234)
|
00:37:05
(234)
|
| 11-28km |
00:56:27
(256)
|
01:33:32
(251)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place open
|
238 / 302
|
|
Place in category
|
64 / 83 |
|
Place by sex
|
226 / 279 |
|
Number
|
1700 |
|
Result
|
02:05:19 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:51:30 |
|
Result better than
|
64 (21.2%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
19 (22.9%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
53 (19%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
|
Place open
|
261 / 321
|
|
Place in category
|
68 / 81 |
|
Place by sex
|
246 / 297 |
|
Number
|
1332 |
|
Result
|
01:46:04 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:44:41 |
|
Result better than
|
60 (18.7%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
13 (16%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
51 (17.2%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|
|
Place open
|
263 / 326
|
|
Place in category
|
68 / 81 |
|
Place by sex
|
247 / 298 |
|
Number
|
996 |
|
Result
|
01:32:38 |
|
Loss to winner
|
00:33:59 |
|
Result better than
|
63 (19.3%) competitors
|
|
Result in category better than
|
13 (16%) competitors
|
|
Result by sex better than
|
51 (17.1%) competitors
|
|
Gallery
|
See photos
|
|